Author:
Hsieh Tsung-Yi,Chang Shang-Jen,Chueh Jeff Shih-Chieh,Lee Yuan-Ju
Abstract
AbstractInfectious complications are among the most common and potentially life-threatening morbidities of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Few predictive tools on these complications include radiological signs. The Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score is an image-based scoring system that incorporates two radiological signs: perinephric fat stranding and perinephric fat thickness. Previous studies have suggested an association between these signs and febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) following lithotripsy. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive factors, including the MAP score, for post-RIRS fever and sepsis. A total of 260 patients who underwent 306 RIRS between October 2019 to December 2023 due to renal or upper ureteral stones were included in this retrospective study. Patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, stone factors, radiological signs, and MAP scores were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with postoperative fever and sepsis. Postoperative fever and sepsis occurred in 20.8% and 8.5% of the patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, female gender, history of recurrent UTI, larger maximal stone diameter, and higher MAP score were independent risk factors for postoperative fever and sepsis. Identifying the risk factors for post-RIRS infectious complications is imperative to providing the proper perioperative management. The MAP score is a promising, easily calculated, image-based scoring system that predicts post-RIRS fever and sepsis.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y (2017) Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol 2017;35(9):1301–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6
2. Corrales M, Sierra A, Doizi S, Traxer O (2022) Risk of sepsis in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol Open Sci 2022;44:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.08.008
3. Huang WY, Chen YF, Carter S, Chang HC, Lan CF, Huang KH (2013) Epidemiology of upper urinary tract stone disease in a Taiwanese population: a nationwide, population based study. Journal of Urology 2013;189(6):2158–2163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.105
4. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society guideline, PART II. Journal of Urology 2016;196(4):1161–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091
5. Skolarikos A, Jung H, Neisius A et al (2023) EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2023. ISBN 978-94-92671-19-6. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis. Accessed 15 March 2024