Author:
Jiang Teng,Diao Xiaoli,Ding Meili,Niu Xiao,Wang Chao,Qi Yan,Jia Wei,Pang Lijuan,Hu Wenhao,Zou Hong,Li Feng
Abstract
AbstractBoth clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) and clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCOC) have a clear cytoplasmic morphological feature, hence it is difficult to identify metastatic ccRCC and CCOC by morphology alone. At present, there are no effective immunohistochemical markers to distinguish between these two tumors. Studies have shown that the clear cytoplasm of ccRCC is mainly caused by cholesterol-rich lipids in the cytoplasm, while that of CCOC is due to the accumulation of cytoplasmic glycogen. Objective: to hypothesize that the scavenger receptor class B-type 1 (SR-B1) protein responsible for HDL cholesterol uptake may be differentially expressed in ccRCC and CCOC, and high CD10 expression in the renal tubular epithelium may assist in distinguishing between ccRCC and CCOC. Methods: effective immunohistochemical markers were applied in 90 cases of renal clear cell carcinoma and 31 cases of ovarian cancer to distinguish between the two types of tumors.Result: SR-B1 and CD10 expression is significantly higher in ccRCC than CCOC. Both SR-B1 and CD10 exhibited focal weak-medium intensity staining in CCOC, and their staining extent and intensity were significantly lower than ccRCC. The sensitivity and specificity of SR-B1 for identifying ccRCC were 74.4% and 83.9%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CD10 for identifying CCOC were 93.3% and 80.6%, respectively. The combined SR-B1( +) CD10( +) immunoprofile supports the diagnosis of ccRCC with a specificity of 93.5%. The combined SR-B1(-) CD10(-) immunoprofile supports the diagnosis of CCOC with a specificity of 93.3%. Conclusions: our findings demonstrate that the combination of SR-B1 and CD10 immunoprofiling is a valuable tool for differential diagnosis of ccRCC and CCOC.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cell Biology,General Medicine,Physiology,Histology
Reference14 articles.
1. Carney EM, Banerjee P, Ellis CL et al (2011) PAX2(-)/PAX8(-)/inhibin A(+) immunoprofile in hemangioblastoma: A helpful combination in the differential diagnosis with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma to the central nervous system. Am J Surg Pathol 35(2):262–267
2. Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW (2013) WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone [M]. IARC Press, Lyon
3. Gebhard RL, Clayman RV, Prigge WF et al (1987) Abnormal cholesterol metabolism in renal clear cell carcinoma. J Lipid Res 28:1177–1184
4. Gulec UK, Paydas S, Guzel AB, Vardar MA, Khatib G, Gumurdulu D (2015) The clinical characteristics and outcomes of cases with pure ovarian clear cell, mixed type and high-grade serous adenocarcinoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292(4):923–929
5. Huang HJ, Chen XY (2016) Fetal adenocarcinoma of the lung: a clinicopathologic analysis of six cases. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi (Chinese Journal of Pathology) 45(9): 617–621
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献