Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Dystonia is a movement disorder characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions. Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common focal dystonia. There are several instruments assessing the symptoms of CD. However, different scales assess different features which may lead to poor patient evaluation.
Aim
The aim of the study was to evaluate the degree of overlap of most often used CD rating scales identified by the literature review.
Methods
A thorough search of the Medline database was conducted in September 2021. Then the frequency of each scale was calculated, and 7 most common scales were included in the content overlap analysis using Jaccard index (0 – no overlap, 1 – full overlap).
Results
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), Tsui score, Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS), Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile 58 (CDIP-58), Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire 24 (CDQ-24), Cervical Dystonia Severity Rating Scale (CDSS), Cervical Dystonia Severity Rating Scale (DDS) and The Dystonia Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (DNMSQuest) were the most common scales. 91 CD symptoms were distinguished from 134 items used in the scales. The mean overlap among all scales was 0.17. 52 (62%) symptoms were examined by more than one scale. The CIDP-58 captured the highest number of symptoms (63.0%), while the CDSS captured the lowest number (8.0%). None of the symptoms were examined by seven instruments.
Conclusions
There was a very weak overlap among scales. High inconsistency between the scales may lead to highly different dystonia severity assessment in clinical practice. Thus, the instruments should be combined.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Neurology (clinical),Dermatology,General Medicine
Reference32 articles.
1. Grütz K, Klein C (2021) Dystonia updates: definition, nomenclature, clinical classification, and etiology. J Neural Transm 128:395–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02314-2
2. Jankovic J (2009) Treatment of hyperkinetic movement disorders. Lancet Neurol 8:844–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70183-8
3. Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, Delong MR, Fahn S, Fung VSC et al (2013) Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord 28:863–873. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25475
4. Lungu C, Tarulli AW, Tarsy D, Mongiovi P, Vanderhorst VG, Rutkove SB (2011) Quantifying muscle asymmetries in cervical dystonia with electrical impedance: a preliminary assessment. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 122:1027–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.09.013
5. Consky ES, Lang AE (1994) Clinical assessments of patients with cervical dystonia. In: Jancovic J, Hallett M (eds) Therapy with botulinum toxin. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 211–237