Current use of fluid biomarkers as outcome measures in Multiple Sclerosis (MS): a review of ongoing pharmacological clinical trials

Abstract

AbstractThe present study aims to describe the state of the art of fluid biomarkers use in ongoing multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials.A review of 608 ongoing protocols in the clinicaltrials.gov and EudraCT databases was performed. The trials enrolled patients with a diagnosis of relapsing remitting MS, secondary progressive MS, and/or primary progressive MS according to Revised McDonald criteria or relapsing MS according to Lublin et al. (2014). The presence of fluid biomarkers among the primary and/or secondary study outcomes was assessed.Overall, 5% of ongoing interventional studies on MS adopted fluid biomarkers. They were mostly used as secondary outcomes in phase 3–4 clinical trials to support the potential disease-modifying properties of the intervention. Most studies evaluated neurofilament light chains (NfLs). A small number considered other novel fluid biomarkers of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration such as glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP).Considering the numerous ongoing clinical trials in MS, still a small number adopted fluid biomarkers as outcome measures, thus testifying the distance from clinical practice. In most protocols, fluid biomarkers were used to evaluate the effectiveness of approved second-line therapies, but also, new drugs (particularly Bruton kinase inhibitors). NfLs were also adopted to monitor disease progression after natalizumab suspension in stable patients, cladribine efficacy after anti-CD20 discontinuation, and the efficacy of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) compared to medical treatment. Nevertheless, further validation studies are needed for all considered fluid biomarkers to access clinical practice, and cost-effectiveness in the “real word” remains to be clarified.