Sour grapes, rational desires and objective consequentialism-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Sour grapes, rational desires and objective consequentialism

Published:1995-12 Issue:3 Volume:80 Page:279-303
ISSN:0031-8116
Container-title:Philosophical Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:Philos Stud

Author:

Rickard M.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00990586.pdf

Reference6 articles.

1. Barry, Brian. 1989, ?Utilitarianism and Preference Change?,Utilitas, Vol. 1, pp. 278?282.

2. Elster Jon. 1983,Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, p. 109. New York: Cambridge University Press.

3. Elster Jon. 1986, ?The Market and the Forum.? InFoundations of Social Choice Theory, edited by Jon Elster and Aanund Hylland, pp. 109?110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Goodin, Robert E. 1986. ?Laundering Preferences.? InFoundations of Social Choice Theory, edited by Jon Elster and Aanund Hylland, p. 75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Goodin, Robert E. 1991. ?Actual Preferences, Actual People?,Utilitas, Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 113?119.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Adaptation and illness severity: the significance of suffering;Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy;2023-05-13

2. Adaptive Preferences Are a Red Herring;Journal of the American Philosophical Association;2017

3. Niche construction, adaptive preferences, and the differences between fitness and utility;Biology & Philosophy;2014-03-06

4. “It Won’t Be as Bad as You Think:” Autonomy and Adaptation to Disability;Adaptation and Autonomy: Adaptive Preferences in Enhancing and Ending Life;2013

5. Autonomy and Adaptive Preferences;Utilitas;2011-02-15