Abstract
AbstractMachine learning is frequently used in various geotechnical applications nowadays. This study presents a statistics and machine learning model for settlement prediction of helical piles that relates compressive service load and soil parameters as a group with the pile parameters. Machine learning algorithms such as Decision Trees, Random Forests, AdaBoost, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were used to develop the predictive models. The models were validated using cross-validation techniques and tested on an independent dataset to assess their accuracy and generalizability. Numerical investigation is used here to supplement the field data by simulating various soil conditions and pile geometries that have not been tested in the field. This study compiled numerical results of 3600 models. As the models are well-calibrated and validated, the data from these models can be reasonably assumed to simulate the ground situation. At the end of this study, a comparative analysis of statistic learning and machine learning (ML) was done using the field axial load tests database and numerical investigation on helical piles. It is observed that ML models like Decision Trees and Random Forests provided the better model with R-squared values of 0.92 and 0.96, respectively, for large diameters. The authors believe this study will permit engineers and state agencies to understand this prediction model's efficacy better, resulting in a more resilient approach to designing large-diameter helical piles for the compressive load.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Al-Omari, R. R., Al-Azzawi, A. A., & AlAbbas, K. A. (2016). Behavior of piled rafts overlying a tunnel in sandy soil. Geomechanics and Engineering, 10(5), 599–615.
2. Chen, Y. J., Lin, S. S., Chang, H. W., & Marcos, M. C. (2011). Evaluation of side resistance capacity for drilled shafts. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 19(2), 13.
3. Clemence, S. P., & Lutenegger, A. J. (2015). Industry survey of state of practice for helical piles and tiebacks. DFI Journal-the Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute, 9(1), 21–41.
4. Coduto, D. P. (2014). Foundation design: principles and practices. Pearson Education Limited.
5. Das, S. K., & Basudhar, P. K. (2006). Undrained lateral load capacity of piles in clay using artificial neural network. Computers and Geotechnics, 33(8), 454–459.