A stacking machine learning model for predicting pullout capacity of small ground anchors
-
Published:2024-07-30
Issue:1
Volume:3
Page:
-
ISSN:2097-0943
-
Container-title:AI in Civil Engineering
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:AI Civ. Eng.
Author:
Li Lin, Zuo Linlong, Wei Guangfeng, Jiang Shouming, Yu JianORCID
Abstract
AbstractSmall ground anchors are widely used to fix securing tents in disaster relief efforts. Given the urgent nature of rescue operations, it is crucial to obtain prompt and accurate estimations of their pullout capacity. In this study, a stacking machine learning (ML) model is developed for the rapid estimation of pullout capacity offered by small ground anchors used for temporary tents, leveraging cone penetration data. The proposed stacking model incorporates three ML algorithms as the base regression models: K-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector regression (SVR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). A dataset comprising 119 in-situ anchor pullout tests, where the cone penetration data were measured, is utilized to train and assess the stacking model performance. Three metrics, i.e., coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE), are employed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the proposed model and compare its performance against four popular ML models and an empirical formula to highlight the advantages of the proposed stacking approach. The results affirm that the proposed stacking model outperforms other ML models and the empirical approach as achieving higher R2 and lower MAE and RMSE and more predicted data points falling within 20% error line. Thus, the proposed stacking model holds promising potential as a solution for efficiently predicting the pullout capacity of small ground anchors.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., & Devin, M. (2016a). Tensorflow large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1603.04467 2. Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G. & Isard, M. (2016b). {Tensorflow}: a system for {large-scale} machine learning, 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16), 265–283. 3. Alidoust, P., Goodarzi, S., Tavana Amlashi, A., & Sadowski, Ł. (2023). Comparative analysis of soft computing techniques in predicting the compressive and tensile strength of seashell containing concrete. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 27(5), 1853–1875. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2022.2102081 4. Amirmojahedi, M., & Abu-Farsakh, M. (2019). Evaluation of 18 direct CPT methods for estimating the ultimate pile capacity of driven piles. Transportation Research Record, 2673(9), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119833365 5. Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24, 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058655
|
|