Abstract
AbstractCrushed over-burnt clay bricks (COBCBs) are a promising alternative to the natural gravel aggregate in lightweight concrete (LWC) production because of their high strength-to-weight ratio. Besides, COBCBs are considered a green aggregate as they solve the problem of solid waste disposal. In this paper, a total of fifteen reinforced concrete (RC) beams were constructed and tested up to failure. The experimental beams were classified into five groups. The control beams were cast with normal weight concrete (NWC), while the remaining four groups of beams were prepared from LWC. The test parameters were the concrete type, reinforcement ratio and silica fume (SF) content. The behavior of beams was evaluated in terms of the crack pattern, failure mode, ultimate deflection, and ductility. The experimental results suggested that the weight and strength of the concrete prepared satisfied the requirements of LWC. In addition, the increase in the reinforcement ratio and SF content improved the behavior of the beams. It is noteworthy that the SF addition caused measurable enhancements to the majority of the performance characteristics of LWC beams. Thus, COBCBs were successfully used as coarse aggregates in the production of high-quality LWC. Both ACI 318-19 and CSA-A23.3-19 made acceptable predictions of the cracking moment, ultimate capacity and mid-span deflection.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2019). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318. ACI.
2. Akhtaruzzaman, A. A., & Hasnat, A. (1983). Properties of concrete using crushed brick as aggregate. Concrete International, 5(2), 58–63.
3. Alhassan, M., Al-rousan, R., & Ababneh, A. (2017). Flexural behavior of lightweight concrete beams encompassing various dosages of macro synthetic fibers and steel ratios. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 7, 280–293.
4. Cachim, P. B. (2008). Mechanical properties of brick aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 23(3), 1292–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.07.023
5. CSA (Canadian Standards Association). (2019). Design of concrete structures. CAN/CSA-A23.3. CSA.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献