Abstract
AbstractThis study investigates the lack of adoption of pricing models for tenders in business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-government (B2G) markets. We aim to identify the gaps between research and practice and propose a future research agenda to bridge these gaps. Our study contributes in three ways: First, we outline how our research agenda can influence the adoption of pricing models across specific practitioner roles in tendering. Second, we introduce systematic science mapping (SSM) as a novel methodology for literature reviews. SSM combines a systematic review and science mapping in a multi-stage, mixed-methods research design. We chart the evolution of 1042 research publications from 1956 to 2022 into three thematic areas. Our review of 163 gray literature publications reveals seven schools of thought on tender price modeling and the causes of theory-to-practice gaps. Finally, we introduce a new metric, the mapping factor (MAPF), as a robustness indicator for systematic literature reviews.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference234 articles.
1. Adams R, Smart P, Huff A (2017) Shades of grey. Int J Manag Rev 19(4):432–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12102
2. Adnan H, Rami M, Yusuwan N, Rosman M (2018) A survey on factors affecting the contractor’s mark-up size decision. WSEAS Trans Bus Econ 15:18–26
3. Agnihotri R, Dingus R, Hu MY, Krush MT (2016) Social media: influencing customer satisfaction in B2B sales. Ind Mark Manag 53:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.09.003
4. Ahmed M, El-Adaway I, Coatney K, Eid M (2016) Construction bidding and the winner’s curse. J Constr Eng Manage 142(2):04015076
5. Aibinu A, Al-Lawati A (2010) Using PLS-SEM technique to model construction organizations’ willingness to participate in e-bidding. Autom Constr 19(6):714–724