Abstract
AbstractBad choices in municipal waste (MW) management cause negative effects on sustainability. Evolving regulation has identified prevention and recycling as the best strategies; nevertheless, disposal in landfilling sites plays an essential role since a complete zero-waste scenario is not realistic, currently. Nowadays, policies require a preliminary waste stabilization to decrease the putrescible content. Therefore, mechanical biological treatment (MBT) has replaced the previous crushing, aimed at simple volume reduction. Literature has proved the effectiveness of MBT when MW collection system is ineffective. The present paper considered a facility in an area with a high-performance MW collection system. A long-term (1999–2019) on-site sampling allowed the comparison between two sites of the facility: the old site (before the MBT activation) and the new area, where the stabilized waste is disposed of. Monitoring of biogas, leachate (analyzed parameters: pH, BOD5, COD, ammonia-nitrogen) and odorous emissions was performed to verify the effect of the stabilization process. The considered long period and the on-site sampling support the relevance of the results, compared to the available literature, often referred to as laboratory scale. The results proved the relatively low benefit of stabilization at the considered facility, which cannot justify the energy consumption of MBT.
Funder
Università Politecnica delle Marche
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanics of Materials,Waste Management and Disposal
Reference84 articles.
1. European Commission (2020) Changing how we produce and consume: New Circular Economy Action Plan shows the way to a climate-neutral, competitive economy of empowered, 11–12. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/pdf/new_circular_economy_action_plan_annex.pdf.
2. Ripa M, Fiorentino G, Vacca V, Ulgiati S (2017) The relevance of site-specific data in Life cycle assessment (LCA). The case of the municipal solid waste management in the metropolitan city of Naples (Italy). J Clean Prod 142:445–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.149
3. Hornsby C, Ripa M, Vassillo C, Ulgiati S (2017) A roadmap towards integrated assessment and participatory strategies in support of decision-making processes. The case of urban waste management. J Clean Prod 142:157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.189
4. Vaccari M, Torretta V, Collivignarelli C (2012) Effect of improving environmental sustainability in developing countries by upgrading solid waste management techniques: a case study. Sustainability 4:2852–2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4112852
5. Ranieri E, Ionescu G, Fedele A, Palmieri E, Ranieri AC, Campanaro V (2017) Sampling, characterisation and processing of solid recovered fuel production from municipal solid waste: an Italian plant case study. Waste Manag Res 35:890–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X17716276
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献