Author:
Oluoch Wyclife Agumba,Whitney Cory W.,Termote Céline,Borgemeister Christian,Schmitt Christine B.
Abstract
AbstractAvailability is a crucial aspect of wild edible plants (WEPs) consumption by indigenous communities. Understanding the local perception of this availability helps to determine, which contribution WEPs can make to rural communities. We used an integrated participatory approach to investigate important parameters and themes that influenced the perception of availability of woody WEPs. We demonstrate the approach in three communities in Turkana County, Kenya. By availability, we referred to the ease of accessing, harvesting, transporting, and processing WEPs for consumption. We conducted three focus group discussions (FGDs). We asked FGD participants to list, score, and discuss availability. We used logistic regression and mixed-content analysis to identify important parameters and themes, respectively. The most important WEPs were the toothbrush tree (Salvadora persica L.), Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.), and mbamba ngoma (Balanites rotundifolia (Tiegh.) Blatt.). Distance, seasonality, price, and adequacy of harvested WEPs for household consumption were important parameters. Culture and tradition, distribution of WEPs, seasonality, and climate change emerged as important themes. We showed the importance of using an integrated participatory approach when assessing the perception of WEPs’ availability by local communities and could be used in comparable arid and semi-arid areas with semi-nomadic pastoralists across Africa.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Ecology
Reference92 articles.
1. AbdELRahman, H. F., Skaug, N., Whyatt, A. M., & Francis, G. W. (2003). Volatile compounds in crude Salvadora persica extracts. Pharmaceutical Biology, 41(6), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1076/phbi.41.6.399.17826
2. Addis, G., Asfaw, Z., & Woldu, Z. (2013). The role of wild and semi-wild edible plants to household food sovereignty in Hamar and Konso Communities, South Ethiopia. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 11, 251–271.
3. Addis, G., Urga, K., & Dikasso, D. (2005). Ethnobotanical study of edible wild plants in some selected districts of Ethiopia. Human Ecology, 33(1), 83–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-005-1656-0
4. Aggemyr, E., Auffret, A. G., Jädergård, L., & Cousins, S. A. O. (2018). Species richness and composition differ in response to landscape and biogeography. Landscape Ecology, 33(12), 2273–2284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0742-9
5. Akuja, T. E., & Kandagor, J. (2019). A review of policies and agricultural productivity in the arid and semi-arid lands (ASALS), Kenya: The case of Turkana County. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 140, 14304–14315. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v140i1.9
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献