Perceived Wellbeing Effects of Ecosystems in Finland
-
Published:2020-05-05
Issue:3
Volume:48
Page:335-345
-
ISSN:0300-7839
-
Container-title:Human Ecology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hum Ecol
Author:
Lyytimäki Jari,Pitkänen Kati
Abstract
AbstractHuman recognition, valuation, and communication lie at the heart of ecosystem goods and services. We explore how the wellbeing effects of ecosystems are recognized and communicated based on data obtained from an information campaign to increase public awareness of the health and wellbeing benefits of rural nature areas in Finland. Interested members of the public from different backgrounds were asked to outline and publicly share short descriptions of their personal recommendations for improving their wellbeing through interacting with rural landscapes. The results indicate that a wide variety of ecosystem types and functions are perceived to be important for producing a range of wellbeing benefits through experiencing and multisensory observations of natural landscapes. The importance of cultural and experiential ecosystem services were highlighted while provisioning services received only minor attention, and regulating services were almost entirely unnoted.
Funder
Strategic Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Ecology
Reference58 articles.
1. Acharya, R. P., Maraseni, T., and Cockfield, G. (2019). Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation – An analysis of publications. Ecosystem Services 39: 100979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100979 2. Caballero-Serrano, V., Alday, J. G., Amigo, J., Caballero, D., Carrasco, J.C., McLaren, B., and Onaindia, M. (2017). Social Perceptions of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Human Ecology 45(4): 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-017-9921-6 3. Chan, K.M., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrim, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B. S., Hannahs, N., Levin, J., Norton, B., Ruckelshaus, M., Russell, R., Tam, J., and Woodside, U. (2012). Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 62(8): 744–756. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7 4. CICES (2019). CICES-V4-3 Spreadsheet. https://cices.eu/resources. Accessed 5 June 2019. 5. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S., and Grasso, M. (2017). Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services 28: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|