Author:
Ba Qing-Xiong,Wang Hong-Zen,Wang Mei-Hsiang
Abstract
AbstractAgrobiodiversity plays a crucial role in maintaining sustainable agricultural systems and supporting local livelihoods, but its integration into indigenous social institutions and cultures remains under-researched. We used a qualitative approach entailing in-depth interviews and participant observation to conduct research among the Rukai indigenous farmers in Taiwan focusing on: (1) how Rukai farmers practice agrobiodiversity, and (2) how these agricultural practices integrated into social institutions and cultural norms. Our findings reveal that food security and risk minimization are the prime considerations to preserve agrobiodiversity. Rukai farmers practice swidden cultivation utilizing five mixed cropping systems in seven different ecosystems that vary by elevation, length of exposure to sunlight, and temperature, intercropping, and regular fallows to maintain soil fertility. Importantly, Rukai agricultural practices are integrated into four social institutions that regulate the distribution and management of land and resources, the timing and nature of agricultural activities, and social recognition and status to ensure maximum production throughout the year and reducing risks posed by climate change.
Funder
National Science and Technology Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Ecology
Reference43 articles.
1. Altman, A., & Mesoudi, A. (2019). Understanding agriculture within the frameworks of Cumulative Cultural Evolution, Gene-Culture Co-evolution, and Cultural Niche Construction. Human Ecology, 47, 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-00090-y.
2. Ba, Q. X., Taiban, S., & Wang, H. Z. (2021). The Moral Economy of Rukai Society: Social Organization, Traditional Agriculture, and Natural hazards Prevention. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 33(3), 451–490. (in Chinese).
3. Berkes, F. (2018). Sacred Ecology (4th edition). Routledge.
4. Byers, B. A., Cunliffe, R. N., & Hudak, A. T. (2001). Linking the conservation of culture and nature: A Case Study of Sacred forests in Zimbabwe. Human Ecology, 29, 187–218. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011012014240.
5. Cajete, G. (2012). Indigenous science and Sustainable Community Development. In J. Hendry, & L. Fitznor (Eds.), Anthropologists, indigenous scholars and the Research Endeavor: Seeking bridges towards mutual respect (pp. 109–117). Routledge Press.