Strategy-proofness implies minimal participation under single-peakedness

Author:

Müller Michael,Puppe Clemens

Abstract

AbstractWe study a model in which agents with single-peaked preferences can participate in a costly voting procedure to determine the value of a one-dimensional variable. We show that, for all positive participation costs and all profiles of individual preferences, there exists a unique equilibrium outcome with one single participant whenever the voting rule is strategy-proof, anonymous, and responsive in the sense that the outcome reacts to a unanimous move of the votes of all agents in the same direction; moreover, the single participant is always one of the ‘extremist’ voters, i.e. either one with the lowest or one with the highest peak. While this uncovers a strong tension between strategy-proofness and participation for all deterministic voting rules on the single-peaked domain (just as in the case of an unrestricted domain), there are simple probabilistic and strategy-proof voting rules that induce full participation in equilibrium.

Funder

Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Aumann, R.: Acceptable points in general cooperative $$n$$-person games. In: Contributions to the Theory of Games IV, pp. 287–324. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1959)

2. Black, D.S.: On the rationale of group decision-making. J. Polit. Econ. 56, 23–34 (1948)

3. Caragiannis, I., Procaccia, A.D., Shah, N.: Truthful univariate estimators. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference of Machine Learning, New York: Curran Associates (2016)

4. Cohensius, G., Manor, S., Meir, R., Meirom, E., Orda, A.: Proxy voting for better outcomes. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2017)

5. Desmedt, Y., Elkind, E.: Equilibria of plurality voting with abstentions. In Proceedings of the EC’ 10, Cambridge, MA: ACM, pp. 347–356 (2010)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3