Abstract
AbstractWe study the relationship between imperfect discrimination, similarity, and stochastic transitivity in generalized versions of Perturbed Utility (Fudenberg et al. in Econometrica 83(6):2371–2409, 2015) and Fechnerian models (Debreu in Econometrica 26(3):440–444, 1958). We show that these models are equivalent and that, within them, the properties of a similarity function can characterize all notions of stochastic transitivity (as Weak, Moderate, and Strong). Specifically, He and Natenzon (Am Econ Rev Insights 6(2):176–195, 2024) have recently shown that choice probabilities are moderately transitive if and only if the similarity function is a metric. We provide a counterpoint and show that unless choice probabilities are strongly transitive, the similarity function can violate the triangle inequality.
Funder
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference25 articles.
1. Debreu, G.: Stochastic choice and cardinal utility. Econometrica 26(3), 440–444 (1958)
2. Fechner, G.T.: Elements of psychophysics. Vol. i. (Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Original work published 1860)), New York (1966/1860)
3. Fishburn, P.C.: Binary choice probabilities: on the varieties of stochastic transitivity. J. Math. Psychol. 10, 327–352 (1973)
4. Fosgerau, M., Melo, E., DePalma, A., Shum, M.: Discrete choice and rational inattention: a general equivalence result. Int Econ Rev 61(4), 1569–1589 (2020)
5. Fudenberg, D., Iijima, R., Strzalecky, T.: Stochastic choice and revealed perturbed utility. Working paper (2014)