Ocular biometry through fully refocused steady-state magnetic resonance imaging sequence: reliability and agreement with the IOLMaster® 500-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Ocular biometry through fully refocused steady-state magnetic resonance imaging sequence: reliability and agreement with the IOLMaster® 500

Published:2021-02-23 Issue:5 Volume:41 Page:1863-1874
ISSN:0165-5701
Container-title:International Ophthalmology
language:en
Short-container-title:Int Ophthalmol

Author:

Perez-Sanchez Lorenzo Ismael^ORCID,Gutierrez-Vazquez Julia,Satrustegui-Lapetra Maria,Ferreira-Manuel Francisco,Arevalo-Manso Juan Jose^ORCID,Gomez-Herrera Juan Jesus,Criado-Alvarez Juan Jose^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Ophthalmology

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10792-021-01748-7.pdf

Reference30 articles.

1. Wu Y, Liu S, Liao R (2017) Prediction accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation methods after laser refractive surgery. BMC Ophthalmol 17(1):44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0439-x

2. Yanagisawa M, Yamashita T, Matsuura M, Fujino Y, Murata H, Asaoka R (2018) Changes in axial length and progression of visual field damage in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59(1):407–417. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22949

3. Wang W, Li X, Chen S, Huang W, Zhang X (2018) Biometric differences between unilateral chronic primary angle closure glaucoma and fellow non-glaucomatous eyes. Semin Ophthalmol 33(5):595–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2017.1375121

4. Lee AC, Qazi MA, Pepose JS (2008) Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 19(1):13–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f1c5ad

5. Chia TMT, Nguyen MT, Jung HC (2018) Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio. Clin Ophthalmol 12:1757–1762. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.S170301