Author:
Mildner Karina,Breitsprecher Leonhard,Currie Silke M.,Stegmeyer Rebekka I.,Stasch Malte,Volkery Stefan,Psathaki Olympia Ekaterini,Vestweber Dietmar,Zeuschner Dagmar
Abstract
AbstractThe nanometer spatial resolution of electron microscopy imaging remains an advantage over light microscopy, but the restricted field of view that can be inspected and the inability to visualize dynamic cellular events are definitely drawbacks of standard transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Several methods have been developed to overcome these limitations, mainly by correlating the light microscopical image to the electron microscope with correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) techniques. Since there is more than one method to obtain the region of interest (ROI), the workflow must be adjusted according to the research question and biological material addressed. Here, we describe in detail the development of a three-dimensional CLEM workflow for mouse skin tissue exposed to an inflammation stimulus and imaged by intravital microscopy (IVM) before fixation. Our aim is to relocate a distinct vessel in the electron microscope, addressing a complex biological question: how do cells interact with each other and the surrounding environment at the ultrastructural level? Retracing the area over several preparation steps did not involve any specific automated instruments but was entirely led by anatomical and artificially introduced landmarks, including blood vessel architecture and carbon-coated grids. Successful retrieval of the ROI by electron microscopy depended on particularly high precision during sample manipulation and extensive documentation. Further modification of the TEM sample preparation protocol for mouse skin tissue even rendered the specimen suitable for serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM).
Funder
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cell Biology,Medical Laboratory Technology,Molecular Biology,Histology
Reference25 articles.
1. Belevich I, Joensuu M, Kumar D, Vihinen H, Jokitalo E (2016) Microscopy image browser: a platform for segmentation and analysis of multidimensional datasets. PLoS Biol 14(1):e1002340. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002340
2. Braun LJ, Stegmeyer RI, Schafer K, Volkery S, Currie SM, Kempe B, Nottebaum AF, Vestweber D (2020) Platelets docking to VWF prevent leaks during leukocyte extravasation by stimulating Tie-2. Blood 136(5):627–639. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2019003442
3. Claesson-Welsh L, Dejana E, McDonald DM (2021) Permeability of the endothelial barrier: identifying and reconciling controversies. Trends Mol Med 27(4):314–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2020.11.006
4. Currie SM, Stegmeyer RI, Mildner K, Breitsprecher L, Zeuschner D, Psathaki OE, Schafer K, Wilkens M, Volkery S, Nieswandt B, Vestweber D (2022) Confocal real-time analysis of cutaneous platelet recruitment during immune-complex-mediated inflammation. J Invest Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2022.03.011
5. Deerinck TJ, Bushong EA, Thor A, Ellisman MH (2010) NCMIR methods for 3D EM: a new protocol for preparation of biological specimens for serial blockface scanning electron microscopy. https://ncmir.ucsd.edu/sbemprotocol
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献