A multicentre evaluation and expert recommendations of use of the newly developed BioFire Joint Infection polymerase chain reaction panel
-
Published:2022-12-07
Issue:2
Volume:42
Page:169-176
-
ISSN:0934-9723
-
Container-title:European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
Author:
Saeed KordoORCID, Ahmad-Saeed Nusreen, Annett Rachel, Barlow Gavin, Barrett Lucinda, Boyd Sara E., Boran Nicola, Davies Peter, Hughes Harriet, Jones Gwennan, Leach Laura, Lynch Maureen, Nayar Deepa, Maloney Robert J., Marsh Martin, Milburn Olivia, Mitchell Shanine, Moffat Lynn, Moore Luke S. P., Murphy Michael E., O’Shea Shaan Ashk, O’Sullivan Fionnuala, Peach Teresa, Petridou Christina, Reidy Niamh, Selvaratnam Mathyruban, Talbot Ben, Taylor Vanessa, Wearmouth Deborah, Aldridge Catherine
Abstract
Abstract
Septic arthritis is a serious condition with significant morbidity and mortality, routinely diagnosed using culture. The FDA has recently approved the rapid molecular BioFire® Joint Infection Panel (BJIP) for synovial fluid. We aimed to evaluate the BJIP compared to culture and its potential use in patient management. A multicentre retrospective evaluation of BJIP was conducted in the UK and Ireland. Positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated between the BJIP and routine culture. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion addressing the optimal or potential case use of the assay practice was facilitated. Three hundred ninety-nine surplus synovial fluid samples (~ 70% from native joints) from eight centres were processed using BJIP in addition to routine culture. An increased yield of positive results was detected using BJIP compared to routine culture (98 vs 83), giving an overall PPA of 91.6% and overall NPA of 93% for the BJIP compared to culture results. The BJIP detected resistant markers and additional organisms that could influence antibiotic choices including Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Kingella kingae. The MDT agreed that the assay could be used, in addition to standard methods, in adult and children patients with specialist advice use based on local needs. Rapid results from BJIP were assessed as having potential clinical impact on patient management. Organisms not included in the panel may be clinically significant and may limit the value of this test for PJI.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),General Medicine
Reference13 articles.
1. Mathews CJ, Weston VC, Jones A, Field M, Coakley G (2010) Bacterial septic arthritis in adults. Lancet 375(9717):846–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61595-6 2. Al Arfaj AS (2008) A prospective study of the incidence and characteristics of septic arthritis in a teaching hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Clin Rheumatol 27(11):1403–1410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-008-0934-9 3. Ferrand J, El Samad Y, Brunschweiler B, Grados F, Dehamchia-Rehailia N, Séjourne A, Schmit JL, Gabrion A, Fardellone P, Paccou J (2016) Morbimortality in adult patients with septic arthritis: a three-year hospital-based study. BMC Infect Dis 16:239. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1540-0 4. Rutherford AI, Subesinghe S, Bharucha T, Ibrahim F, Kleymann A, Galloway JB (2016) A population study of the reported incidence of native joint septic arthritis in the United Kingdom between 1998 and 2013. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 55(12):2176–2180. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kew323 5. Margaretten ME, Kohlwes J, Moore D, Bent S (2007) Does this adult patient have septic arthritis? JAMA 297(13):1478–1488. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.13.1478
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|