Abstract
AbstractMultiple episodes of Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia (EfsB) may indicate a relapse and be due to an undiagnosed infective endocarditis (IE). The aims were to study the clinical presentation of patients with EfsB with focus on the risk of recurrent infection and IE, identify potential improvements of the management, and to investigate whether E. faecalis isolates from different episodes in the same patient were identical. In a retrospective study, a cohort of patients with monomicrobial (M) EfsB episodes was analyzed. Clinical data from medical records were collected. Furthermore, blood culture isolates from patients with multiple episodes were subjected to whole genome sequencing and multilocus sequence typing. In 666 episodes of MEfsB, 69 patients with IE and 43 with recurrent infections were found. Patients without IE, but with a following episode diagnosed as IE, were compared to those without a following episode. Variables significantly correlated with IE were long duration of symptoms, growth in all blood cultures, unknown origin of infection, heart murmur, and predisposition for IE. Transesophageal echocardiography, all negative, was done in 4 out of 11 episodes during the first episodes, later diagnosed with IE. In 28 of 31 patients with two or more EfsB episodes, isolates with identical sequence type were found. Episodes of EfsB in patients later diagnosed with IE showed features of IE already during the first episodes, were not adequately evaluated, are due to identical isolates, and most likely represent true relapses. Risk factor analysis should guide the use of echocardiography.
Funder
Swedish Government Fund for Clinical Research (ALF
Foundations of Österlund
Foundation of Skåne University Hospital
Region Stockholm, ALF grant
Karolinska Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),General Medicine
Reference21 articles.
1. Agudelo Higuita NI, Huycke MM (2014) Enterococcal disease, epidemiology, and implications for treatment. In: Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N (eds) Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection, Boston
2. Maki DG, Agger WA (1988) Enterococcal bacteremia: clinical features, the risk of endocarditis, and management. Medicine (Baltimore) 67(4):248–269
3. Noskin GA, Peterson LR, Warren JR (1995) Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia: acquisition and outcome. Clin Infect Dis 20(2):296–301
4. Pinholt M, Ostergaard C, Arpi M, Bruun NE, Schonheyder HC, Gradel KO, Sogaard M, Knudsen JD, Danish Collaborative Bacteraemia Network (DACOBAN) (2014) Incidence, clinical characteristics and 30-day mortality of enterococcal bacteraemia in Denmark 2006-2009: a population-based cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(2):145–151
5. Bouza E, Kestler M, Beca T, Mariscal G, Rodríguez-Créixems M, Bermejo J, Fernández-Cruz A, Fernández-Avilés F, Muñoz P (2015) The NOVA score: a proposal to reduce the need for transesophageal echocardiography in patients with enterococcal bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 60(4):528–535
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献