Author:
Pei Tao,Yan Xiaorui,Shu Hua,Wang Xi,Chen Xiao,Guo Sihui,Jiang Jingyu,Song Ci,Chen Jie
Abstract
AbstractUrban function refers to various roles and activities that take place in an urban region or a public facility. Previous research only focused on the types of urban function and its quantitative characterization did not attract enough attention. In this paper, we highlight the issue of quantifying the urban function and divide it into two aspects: one is the intensity of the urban function, which can be seen as the capacity to accommodate people engaging in activities related to the function, and the other is its influence on the surrounding area. Due to the cause-and-effect dynamics between urban functions and geographical flows, which refer to the human or objects moving between locations, geographical flows have been used to estimate the intensity and influence of urban function. Based on the review of recent updates, this paper provides a research framework for utilizing flow data to quantify urban function in terms of intensity and influence. Regarding the intensity, the indices are mainly based on the volume of inflow/outflow and their ratio. Regarding the influence, there are two types of indices for evaluating it: one for planar facilities and the other for linear facilities. To describe the intensity and influence of the urban function simultaneously, the volume along with the length of flows are considered into the indices, which can quantify the importance or irreplaceability of a place or facility. The analysis shows that the geographical flows provide a new perspective for quantifying urban function in terms of intensity and influence.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Innovation Project of LREIS
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference66 articles.
1. Ambarwati, L., Verhaeghe, R., van Arem, B., & Pel, A. J. (2016). The influence of integrated space–transport development strategies on air pollution in urban areas. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,
44, 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.02.015
2. Batty, M. (2013). The New Science of Cities. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9399.001.0001
3. Biba, S., Curtin, K. M., & Manca, G. (2010). A new method for determining the population with walking access to transit. International Journal of Geographical Information Science,
24(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810802646679
4. Boone, C. G., Buckley, G. L., Grove, J. M., & Sister, C. (2009). Parks and people: an environmental justice inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,
99(4), 767–787.
5. Burghouwt, G., & Redondi, R. (2013). Connectivity in Air Transport Networks: An Assessment of Models and Applications. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 47(1), 35-53. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24396351