Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study investigated the association between apparent diffusion coefficients in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 4/5 lesions and clinically significant prostate cancer in the transition zone.
Methods
We included 102 patients who underwent transperineal cognitive fusion targeted biopsy for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 4/5 lesions in the transition zone between 2016 and 2020. The association between apparent diffusion coefficients and prostate cancers in the transition zone was analyzed.
Results
The detection rate of prostate cancer was 49% (50/102), including clinically significant prostate cancer in 37.3% (38/102) of patients. The minimum apparent diffusion coefficients in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer were 494.5 ± 133.6 µm2/s, which was significantly lower than 653.8 ± 172.5 µm2/s in patients with benign histology or clinically insignificant prostate cancer. Age, prostate volume, transition zone volume, and mean and minimum apparent diffusion coefficients were associated with clinically significant prostate cancer. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value (odds ratio: 0.994; p < 0.001) was an independent predictor of clinically significant prostate cancer. When the cutoff value of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient was less than 595 µm2/s, indicating the presence of prostate cancer in the transition zone, the detection rate increased to 59.2% (29/49) in this cohort.
Conclusion
The minimum apparent diffusion coefficient provided additional value to indicate the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer in the transition zone. It may help consider the need for subsequent biopsies in patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 4/5 lesions and an initial negative targeted biopsy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Oncology,Hematology,General Medicine,Surgery
Reference28 articles.
1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F et al. 2020 Global cancer observatory: cancer today. https://gco.iarc.fr/today, Accessed Feb 2021. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
2. Carroll PH, Mohler JL (2018) NCCN guidelines updates: prostate cancer and prostate cancer early detection. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 16:620–623. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2018.0036
3. Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL et al (2016) Pi-RADS prostate imaging reporting and DATA SYSTEM (2015), version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40
4. Cash H, Maxeiner A, Stephan C et al (2016) The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy. World J Urol 34:525–532
5. Mertan FV, Greer MD, Shih JH et al (2016) Prospective Evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 for prostate cancer detection. J Urol 196:690–696
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献