Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Coccydynia, characterized by persistent pain in the coccygeal region, significantly impacts patients' quality of life. While various treatment modalities exist, including conservative measures and surgical interventions like coccygectomy, optimal management remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes, functional improvements, and quality of life in patients with chronic coccydynia undergoing either infiltrative treatment or coccygectomy.
Methods
Data from patients treated at our institution from January 2018 to December 2022 were analyzed. Participants meeting inclusion criteria were divided into two groups: Group A underwent coccygectomy, while Group B received conservative therapy. Clinical assessments, radiographic evaluations, and patient-reported outcomes were collected preoperatively and at follow-up intervals.
Results
Of the 223 initially examined patients, 55 met inclusion criteria. Group A (n = 21) underwent coccygectomy, while Group B (n = 34) received conservative therapy. Both groups showed significant pain reduction post-intervention, with sustained improvement in Group A. Functional outcomes favoured Group A, with significant improvements in disability and quality of life measures. Complications were minimal, with only one case of superficial wound infection in Group A.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that coccygectomy provides superior and lasting pain relief, functional improvement, and quality of life improvement compared to conservative therapy. While complications were minimal, further research with larger cohorts is warranted to validate these results and explore long-term outcomes. Despite its historical association with complications, advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care have led to improved outcomes and reduced complication rates. Thus, coccygectomy should be considered in the treatment algorithm for patients with debilitating coccydynia.
Funder
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Kara D, Pulatkan A, Ucan V, Orujov S, Elmadag M (2023) Traumatic coccydynia patients benefit from coccygectomy more than patients undergoing coccygectomy for non-traumatic causes. J Orthop Surg Res. 18:802. Published 2023 Oct 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04098-5
2. Nathan ST, Fisher BE, Roberts CS (2010) Coccydynia: a review of pathoanatomy, aetiology, treatment and outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1622–1627. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B12.25486
3. Perna A, Ricciardi L, Barone G, Tamburrelli FC, Proietti L, Pola E (2018) Medical management of acute non-specific low back pain: comparison of different medical treatments, one center’s retrospective analysis. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 32(6 Suppl. 1):121–129
4. Meluzio MC, Smakaj A, Perna A et al (2022) Epidemiology, diagnosis and management of Baastrup’s disease: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Sci 66:519–525. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05428-X
5. Maigne JY, Tamalet B (1996) Standardized radiologic protocol for the study of common coccygodynia and characteristics of the lesions observed in the sitting position. Clinical elements differentiating luxation, hypermobility, and normal mobility. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:2588–2593