Author:
Davidson Amit,Blum Shlomo,Harats Elad,Kachko Erick,Essa Ahmad,Efraty Ram,Peyser Amos,Giannoudis Peter V.
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The recently developed femoral neck system (FNS) for treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNF), comprises theoretical biomechanical advantages compared to other implants. The aim of this study was to validate the safety and to report outcomes of patients treated with the FNS.
Method
A retrospective multicentric analysis of patients treated by FNS with a minimum of three months of follow-up. Details analysed from three medical centres were operative duration, estimated blood loss, initial hospitalisation duration, fixation quality as well as complications and reoperation rate. Patients who had revision surgery were compared to all other patients to identify risk factors for failure. In addition, a literature review was performed to analyse data on FNS clinical implementation and patient’s outcomes. The two data sets were combined and analysed.
Results
One-hundred and two patients were included in this study cohort with an average follow-up of seven months (range 3–27). Ten papers were included in the literature review, reporting data on 278 patients. Overall, 380 patients were analysed. Average age was 62.6 years, 52% of the fractures were classified as Gardens 1–2. Overall, the revision rate was 9.2% (14 patients diagnosed with cut-out of implant, 10 with AVN, 8 with non-union and 8 with hardware removal). For the 102 patients in the cohort risk factors for reoperation included patients age, surgeon seniority and inadequate placement of the implant.
Conclusion
This study shows that FNS is a safe treatment option for FNF. Intra-operative parameters and failure rates are comparable to previously reported rates for this implant and other frequently used implants.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference28 articles.
1. Physicians RCo (2017) National hip fracture database (NHFD) annual report 2017. In. RCP London.
2. Zelle BA, Salazar LM, Howard SL, Parikh K, Pape HC (2022) Surgical treatment options for femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05314-3
3. Panteli M, Rodham P, Giannoudis PV (2015) Biomechanical rationale for implant choices in femoral neck fracture fixation in the non-elderly. Injury 46:445–452
4. Stoffel K, Zderic I, Gras F, Sommer C, Eberli U, Mueller D, Oswald M, Gueorguiev B (2017) Biomechanical evaluation of the femoral neck system in unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures: a comparison with the dynamic hip screw and cannulated screws. J Orthop Trauma 31:131–137
5. Schopper C (2018) Biomechanical evaluation of the femoral neck fracture fixation technique with the new implant FNS in comparison to DHS Blade. Universität Ulm, DHS Screw with antirotation screw and Three Cannulated Screws. In
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献