Abstract
AbstractThe variety of available technology options for the operation of zero-emission bus systems gives rise to the problem of finding an optimal technology decision for bus operators. Among others, overnight charging, opportunity charging and hydrogen-based technology options are frequently pursued technological solutions. As their operating conditions are strongly influenced by the urban context, an optimal technology decision is far from trivial. In this paper, we propose an Integer Linear Programming (ILP) based optimization model that is built upon a broad input database, which allows a customized adaption to local circumstances. The ultimate goal is to determine an optimal technology decision for each bus line, considering its combined effects on charging and vehicle scheduling as well as infrastructural design. To this end, we develop technology-specific network representations for five distinct technologies. These networks can be viewed individually or as a multi-layered graph, which represents the input for the optimal technology mix. The proposed optimization framework is applied to a real-world instance with more than 4.000 timetabled trips. To study the sensitivity of solutions, parameter changes are tested in a comprehensive scenario design. The subsequent analysis produces valuable managerial insights for the bus operator and highlights the decisive role of certain planning assumptions. The results of our computations reveal that the deployment of a mixed fleet can indeed lead to financial benefits. The comparison of single technology system solutions provides a further basis for decision making and demonstrates relative superiorities between different technologies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Information Systems
Reference41 articles.
1. Abdelwahed A, van den Berg PL, Brandt T, Ketter W, Mulder J (2021) A boost for urban sustainability: optimizing electric transit bus networks in Rotterdam. INFORMS J Appli Anal 51(5):391–407. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2021.1092
2. Bunte S, Kliewer N (2009) An overview on vehicle scheduling models. Public Transp 1(4):299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-010-0018-5
3. Dirks N, Wagner D, Schiffer M, Walther G (2021) A concise guide on the integration of battery electric buses into urban bus networks. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2104.10752, arXiv:2104.10752
4. Estrada M, Mensión J, Salicrú M, Badia H (2022) Charging operations in battery electric bus systems considering fleet size variability along the service. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 138:103609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103609
5. European Commision (2016) Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. In: A European strategy for low-emission mobility. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0501
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献