Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To assess associations between usual source of care (USC) type and health status, healthcare access, utilization, and expenses among adult cancer survivors.
Methods
This retrospective cross-sectional analysis using 2013–2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey included 2690 observations representing 31,953,477 adult cancer survivors who were currently experiencing cancer and reporting one of five USC types: solo practicing physician (SPP), a specific person in a non-hospital facility, a specific person in a hospital-based facility, a non-hospital facility, and a hospital-based facility. We used logistic regressions and generalized linear models to determine associations of USC type with health status, healthcare access, utilization, and expenses, adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics.
Results
All non-SPP USC types were associated with reporting more difficulties contacting USC by telephone during business hours (p < 0.05). Compared to SPP, non-hospital facility was associated with more difficulty getting needed prescriptions (OR: 1.81, p = 0.036) and higher annual expenses ($5225, p = 0.028), and hospital-based facility was associated with longer travel time (OR: 1.61, p = 048), more ED visits (0.13, p = 0.049), higher expenses ($6028, p = 0.014), and worse self-reported health status (OR: 1.93, p = 0.001), although both were more likely to open on nights/weekends (p < 0.05). Cancer survivors with a specific person in a hospital-based facility (vs. SPP) as USC were > twofold as likely (p < 0.05) to report difficulty getting needed prescriptions and contacting USC afterhours.
Conclusions
Among adult cancer survivors who were currently experiencing cancer, having a non-SPP type of UCS was associated with reporting more difficulties accessing care, worse health, more ED visits, and higher total expenses.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Transitioning to SPP type of USC may result in better healthcare outcomes.
Funder
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Oncology (nursing),Oncology
Reference45 articles.
1. Institute for Healthcare Improvement: Health Equity. (2020). Retrieved January 13, 2020, from http://www.ihi.org/Topics/Health-Equity/Pages/default.aspx
2. Williams MM. Invisible, unequal, and forgotten: health disparities in the elderly. Notre Dame Journal of Law Ethics Public Policy. 2007;21(2):441–78.
3. Farias AJ, Ochoa CY, Toledo G, Bang SI, Hamilton AS, Du XL. Racial/ethnic differences in patient experiences with health care in association with earlier stage at breast cancer diagnosis: findings from the SEER-CAHPS data. Cancer Causes Control. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-019-01254-3.
4. Weech-Maldonado R, Elliott MN, Adams JL, Haviland AM, Klein DJ, Hambarsoomian K, Gaillot, S. Do racial/ethnic disparities in quality and patient experience within Medicare plans generalize across measures and racial/ethnic groups? In Health Serv Res 2015;50:1829–1849). Blackwell Publishing Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12297
5. Kent JA, Patel V, Varela NA. Gender disparities in health care. Mt Sinai J Med: J Transl Pers Med. 2012;79(5):555–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/msj.21336.