Author:
Turkez Hasan,Tozlu Ozlem Ozdemir,Arslan Mehmet Enes,Baba Cem,Saracoglu Muhammed Melik,Yıldız Edanur,Tatar Abdulgani,Mardinoglu Adil
Abstract
Abstract3-chloro-1,2-propanediol (3-MCPD) is a member of the group of pollutants known as chloropropanols and is considered a genotoxic carcinogen. Due to the occurrence of 3-MCPD, which cannot be avoided in multiplexed food processes, it is necessary to explore novel agents to reduce or prevent the toxicity of 3-MCPD. Many recent studies on boron compounds reveal their superior biological roles such as antioxidant, anticancer, and antigenotoxic properties. In the current investigation, we have evaluated in vitro cytotoxic, oxidative, and genotoxic damage potential of 3-MCPD on human whole blood cultures and the alleviating effect of boric acid (BA) and borax (BX) for 72 h. In our in vitro experiments, we have treated blood cells with BA and BX (2.5, 5, and 10 mg/L) and 3-MCPD (at IC50 of 11.12 mg/l) for 72 h to determine the cytotoxic damage potential by using MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assays. Oxidative damage was assessed using total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. Genotoxicity evaluations were performed using chromosome aberrations (CAs) and 8-hydroxy deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) assays. The result of our experiments showed that the 3-MCPD compound induced cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and genotoxicity in a clear concentration-dependent manner. BA and BX reduced cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and genotoxicity induced by 3-MCPD. In conclusion, BA and BX are safe and non-genotoxic under the in vitro conditions and can alleviate cytotoxic, oxidative, and genetic damage induced by 3-MCPD in the human blood cells. Our findings suggest that dietary boron supplements may offer a novel strategy for mitigating hematotoxicity induced by xenobiotics, including 3-MCPD.
Funder
Erzurum Technical University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. Cho W-S, Han BS, Nam KT et al (2008) Carcinogenicity study of 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol in Sprague–Dawley rats. Food Chem Toxicol 46:3172–3177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.07.003
2. Fang M, Zhou L, Zhang H et al (2019) A molecularly imprinted polymers/carbon dots-grafted paper sensor for 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol determination. Food Chem 274:156–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.133
3. Lee BQ, Khor SM (2015) 3-Chloropropane-1,2-diol (3-MCPD) in soy sauce: a review on the formation, reduction, and detection of this potential carcinogen. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 14:48–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12120
4. Crews C, Hough P, Brereton P et al (2002) Survey of 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol (3-MCPD) in selected food groups, 1999-2000. Food Addit Contam:1999–2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/0265203011008539
5. BfR. (2007) Infant formula and follow-up formula may contain harmful 3-MCPD fatty acid esters, BfR Opinion No. 047/2007, December 11, http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/245/infant_formula_and_follow_up_formula_may_contain_harmful_3_mcpd_fatty_acid_esters.pdf (accessed December 2013)