Abstract
AbstractThis study proposes and investigates the feasibility of the passive assistive device to assist agricultural harvesting task and reduce the Musculoskeletal Disorder (MSD) risk of harvesters using computational musculoskeletal modelling and simulations. Several passive assistive devices comprised of elastic exotendon, which acts in parallel with different back muscles (rectus abdominis, longissimus, and iliocostalis), were designed and modelled. These passive assistive devices were integrated individually into the musculoskeletal model to provide passive support for the harvesting task. The muscle activation, muscle force, and joint moment were computed with biomechanical simulations for unassisted and assisted motions. The simulation results demonstrated that passive assistive devices reduced muscle activation, muscle force, and joint moment, particularly when the devices were attached to the iliocostalis and rectus abdominis. It was also discovered that assisting the longissimus muscle can alleviate the workload by distributing a portion of it to the rectus abdominis. The findings in this study support the feasibility of adopting passive assistive devices to reduce the MSD risk of the harvesters during agricultural harvesting. These findings can provide valuable insights to the engineers and designers of physical assistive devices on which muscle(s) to assist during agricultural harvesting.
Funder
Advanced Engineering Platform, Monash University Malaysia
Monash Industry Palm Oil Research Platform, Monash University Malaysia
Monash University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Instrumentation,Biomedical Engineering,Biophysics,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology,Biotechnology
Reference40 articles.
1. Dembia CL, Silder A, Uchida TK, Hicks JL, Delp SL (2017) Simulating ideal assistive devices to reduce the metabolic cost of walking with heavy loads. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180320
2. Farris DJ, Hicks JL, Delp SL, Sawicki GS (2014) Musculoskeletal modelling deconstructs the paradoxical effects of elastic ankle exoskeletons on plantar-flexor mechanics and energetics during hopping. J Exp Biol 217(22):4018–4028. https://doi.org/10.1242%2Fjeb.107656
3. Ashkani O, Maleki A, Jamshidi N (2017) Design, simulation and modelling of auxiliary exoskeleton to improve human gait cycle. Phy Eng Sci in Med 69(9):2797–2805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-016-0502-6
4. Nussbaum MA, Lowe BD, de Looze M, Harris-Adamson C, Smets M (2019) An introduction to the special issue on occupational exoskeletons. IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors 7:153–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2019.1709695
5. Nelson AJ, Hall PT, Saul KR, Crouch DL (2020) Effect of mechanically passive, wearable shoulder exoskeletons on muscle output during dynamic upper extremity movements: a computational simulation study. J Appl Biomech 36(2):59–67. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2018-0369