A proof of concept study for machine learning application to stenosis detection

Author:

Jones Gareth,Parr Jim,Nithiarasu Perumal,Pant SanjayORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis proof of concept (PoC) assesses the ability of machine learning (ML) classifiers to predict the presence of a stenosis in a three vessel arterial system consisting of the abdominal aorta bifurcating into the two common iliacs. A virtual patient database (VPD) is created using one-dimensional pulse wave propagation model of haemodynamics. Four different machine learning (ML) methods are used to train and test a series of classifiers—both binary and multiclass—to distinguish between healthy and unhealthy virtual patients (VPs) using different combinations of pressure and flow-rate measurements. It is found that the ML classifiers achieve specificities larger than 80% and sensitivities ranging from 50 to 75%. The most balanced classifier also achieves an area under the receiver operative characteristic curve of 0.75, outperforming approximately 20 methods used in clinical practice, and thus placing the method as moderately accurate. Other important observations from this study are that (i) few measurements can provide similar classification accuracies compared to the case when more/all the measurements are used; (ii) some measurements are more informative than others for classification; and (iii) a modification of standard methods can result in detection of not only the presence of stenosis, but also the stenosed vessel.

Funder

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Biomedical Engineering

Reference57 articles.

1. Akobeng AK (2007) Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr 96(5):644–647

2. Alastruey J, Parker KH, Sherwin SJ et al (2012) Arterial pulse wave haemodynamics. In: 11th international conference on pressure surges, pp 401–442

3. Alberg AJ, Park JW, Hager BW et al (2004) The use of verall accuracy to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests. J Gen Intern Med 19(5p1):460–465

4. Boileau E, Nithiarasu P, Blanco PJ et al (2015) A benchmark study of numerical schemes for one-dimensional arterial blood flow modelling. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 31(10):e02732. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.2732

5. Etienne B, Pant S, Roobottom C, et al. (2018) Estimating the accuracy of a reduced-order model for the calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR). Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 34(1):e2908

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3