Abstract
AbstractIn the Late Permian Zechstein Sea of Central Europe, up to 2000 m of evaporitic rocks were deposited in at least four consecutive cycles. The age of these evaporitic rocks could not yet be precisely determined, because they are virtually fossil-free and do not contain radiometrically datable volcanic layers. A chemostratigraphic age of the succession can be determined by comparing 87Sr/86Sr ratios of marine gypsum and anhydrite to the worldwide marine strontium evolution curve. Unfortunately, published 87Sr/86Sr data of the Zechstein succession are characterized by frequent outliers towards higher ratios, making an age assignment challenging. The scatter in 87Sr/86Sr ratios might be induced by different processes like the contribution of meteoric water to the brine, in-situ Rb decay, or post-depositional hydrothermal or diagenetic overprint. Here, we present a dataset of 26 new gypsum and anhydrite 87Sr/86Sr ratios from drill cores situated at “Alter Stolberg” in the northernmost Thuringian Basin. Evaporites of the Werra-, Staßfurt-, and Leine cycles were sampled. The close proximity of the drillings allows a very accurate assignment of the stratigraphic position of each sample, so that trends and outliers in 87Sr/86Sr ratios can easily be recognized. While the entire Werra Formation obviously revealed non-marine 87Sr/86Sr ratios, the lowermost 87Sr/86Sr ratios in the Staßfurt and Leine Formations can be assumed to represent marine ratios and allow estimating a chemostratigraphic age of 257‒254 Ma. The combination of the 87Sr/86Sr data with the mineral composition of the samples suggests a contribution of meteoric water, probably river water, to the Zechstein Sea as the main reason for the observed increase in 87Sr/86Sr ratios. Additional in-situ Rb decay, related to the riverine input of clay minerals, cannot be excluded. Modelling the amounts of sea water and meteoric water in the brine indicates that 83‒99% of meteoric water would be necessary to explain the highest 87Sr/86Sr ratios observed in the Werra Formation.
Graphical abstract
Funder
Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference82 articles.
1. Anderson PS, Wasserburg GJ, Ingri J (1992) The sources and transport of Sr and Nd isotopes in the Baltic Sea. Earth Planet Sci Lett 113:459–472
2. Balzer D (2020) Sangerhausen-Sulfat. In: Paul J, Heggemann H (eds) Deutsche Stratigraphische Kommission, Stratigraphie von Deutschland XII. Zechstein. Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften vol 89, pp 265–266
3. Bechtel A, Sun Y, Püttmann W, Hoernes S, Hoefs J (2001) Isotopic evidence for multi-stage base metal enrichment in the Kupferschiefer from the Sangerhausen Basin, Germany. Chem Geol 176:31–49
4. Beyrich HE, Lossen CA (1857) Geologische Spezialkarte von Preussen und den Thüringischen Staaten Nr. 4431: Stolberg [Stolberg am Harz], Blatt 4. Kraatz, Berlin, doi: https://doi.org/10.23689/fidgeo-2158.
5. Brauns CM, Pätzold T, Haack U (2003) A Re-Os study bearing on the age of the Kupferschiefer mineralization at Sangerhausen. XVth International Congress of Carboniferous and Permian Stratigraphy, Utrecht, Abstracts, p 66