Abstract
AbstractMany social scientists still resist Darwinian insights. A possible reason for this is a fear of being associated with Social Darwinism. This article updates a 2002 search for appearances of Social Darwinism in articles and reviews on the JSTOR database. This database has since increased substantially in size, and it now includes far more publications in languages other than English. Use of the term Social Darwinism was rare before the 1940s. Talcott Parsons used it in 1932 to criticise the analytic use of the core Darwinian concepts in social science. Subsequently, and for the first time, Herbert Spencer and Willam Graham Sumner were described as Social Darwinists. This led to a major change of meaning of the term, where it was associated more, but not entirely, with free market individualism. With this reconstructed meaning, a 1944 bestselling book by Richard Hofstadter provoked an explosion of usage of the term in postwar years. The continuing use of the term is partly ideologically motivated and has served to deter consideration of Darwinian ideas in social science.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference107 articles.
1. Andersen ES (2004) Population thinking, price’s equation and the analysis of economic evolution. Evol Inst Econ Rev 1(1):127–148
2. Alchian AA (1950) Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. J Pol Econ 58(2):211–22
3. Bannister RC (1979) Social Darwinism; Science and Myth in Anglo-American Social Thought. Temple University Press, Philadelphia
4. Bellomy Donald C (1984) “Social Darwinism” Revisited. Perspectives in American History, New Series 1:1–129
5. Berle AA (1950) Natural Selection of Political Forces (Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press)