Abstract
AbstractDifferent voters behave differently at the polls, different students make different university choices, or different countries choose different health care systems. Many research questions important to social scientists concern choice behavior, which involves dealing with nominal dependent variables. Drawing on the principle of maximum random utility, we propose applying a flexible and general heterogeneous multinomial logit model to study differences in choice behavior. The model systematically accounts for heterogeneity that classical models do not capture, indicates the strength of heterogeneity, and permits examining which explanatory variables cause heterogeneity. As the proposed approach allows incorporating theoretical expectations about heterogeneity into the analysis of nominal dependent variables, it can be applied to a wide range of research problems. Our empirical example uses individual-level survey data to demonstrate the benefits of the model in studying heterogeneity in electoral decisions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Statistics and Probability
Reference33 articles.
1. Adams J, Merrill S III, Grofman B (2005) A unified theory of party competition: a cross-national analysis integrating spatial and behavioral factors. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
2. Agresti A (2007) An introduction to categorical data analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
3. Alvarez RM, Nagler J (2004) Party system compactness: measurement and consequences. Polit Anal 12(1):46–62
4. Converse PE (1964) The nature of belief systems in the mass public. In: Apter DE (ed) Ideology and Discontent. Free Press, New York, NY
5. Davis OA, Hinich MJ, Ordeshook PC (1970) An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process. Am Polit Sci Rev 64(2):426–448
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献