Abstract
AbstractSurvey sampling and, more generally, Official Statistics are experiencing an important renovation time. On one hand, there is the need to exploit the huge information potentiality that the digital revolution made available in terms of data. On the other hand, this process occurred simultaneously with a progressive deterioration of the quality of classical sample surveys, due to a decreasing willingness to participate and an increasing rate of missing responses. The switch from survey-based inference to a hybrid system involving register-based information has made more stringent the debate and the possible resolution of the design-based versus model-based approaches controversy. In this new framework, the use of statistical models seems unavoidable and it is today a relevant part of the official statistician toolkit. Models are important in several different contexts, from Small area estimation to non sampling error adjustment, but they are also crucial for correcting bias due to over and undercoverage of administrative data, in order to prevent potential selection bias, and to deal with different definitions and/or errors in the measurement process of the administrative sources. The progressive shift from a design-based to a model-based approach in terms of super-population is a matter of fact in the practice of the National Statistical Institutes. However, the introduction of Bayesian ideas in official statistics still encounters difficulties and resistance. In this work, we attempt a non-systematic review of the Bayesian development in this area and try to highlight the extra benefit that a Bayesian approach might provide. Our general conclusion is that, while the general picture is today clear and most of the basic topics of survey sampling can be easily rephrased and tackled from a Bayesian perspective, much work is still necessary for the availability of a ready-to-use platform of Bayesian survey sampling in the presence of complex sampling design, non-ignorable missing data patterns, and large datasets.
Funder
Sapienza Universitá di Roma
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Statistics and Probability
Reference64 articles.
1. Aitkin, M. (2008). Applications of the Bayesian Bootstrap in finite population inference. Journal of Official Statistics 24, 21–51.
2. Basu, D. (1971). An essay on the logical foundations of survey sampling. I. In Foundations of statistical inference (Proc. Sympos., Univ. Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., 1970), pp. 203–242. Holt, Rinehart and Winston of Canada, Toronto, Ont.
3. Basu, D. (1978). On the Relevance of Randomization in Data Analysis. In Survey Sampling and Measurement, N. K. Namboodiri, ed, pp. 267–292. Academic Press, New Tork.
4. Beaumont, J.-F. and D. Haziza (2022). Statistical inference from finite population samples: A critical review of frequentist and bayesian approaches. Canadian Journal of Statistics 50(4), 1186–1212.
5. Berger, J. (2006). The case for objective Bayesian analysis. Bayesian Analysis 1(3), 385 – 402.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献