Abstract
AbstractWe present an algorithm to solve capacity extension problems that frequently occur in energy system optimization models. Such models describe a system where certain components can be installed to reduce future costs and achieve carbon reduction goals; however, the choice of these components requires the solution of a computationally expensive combinatorial problem. In our proposed algorithm, we solve a sequence of linear programs that serve to tighten a budget—the maximum amount we are willing to spend towards reducing overall costs. Our proposal finds application in the general setting where optional investment decisions provide an enhanced portfolio over the original setting that maintains feasibility. We present computational results on two model classes, and demonstrate computational savings up to 96% on certain instances.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Banos, R., Manzano-Agugliaro, F., Montoya, F., Gil, C., Alcayde, A., Gómez, J.: Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15(4), 1753–1766 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.12.008
2. Billinton, R., Karki, R.: Capacity expansion of small isolated power systems using PV and wind energy. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 16(4), 892–897 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/59.962442
3. Bundesregierung.de: Das Energiekonzept 2050 (2010). https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/997532/778196/c6acc2c59597103d1ff9a437acf27bd/infografik-energie-textversion-data.pdf?download=1. Accessed 07 Dec 2020
4. Chinneck, J.W.: Feasibility and infeasibility in optimization: algorithms and computational methods, vol. 118. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (2007)
5. Ember: Daily EU ETS carbon market price (Euros). https://ember-climate.org/data/carbon-price-viewer. Accessed 26 Jan 2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献