Abstract
AbstractFragility curves are the primary way of assessing seismic risk for a building with numerous studies focused on deriving these fragility curves and how to account for the inherent uncertainty in the seismic assessment. This study focuses on a three-story steel moment frame structure and performs a fragility assessment of the building using a new approach called SPO2FRAG (Static Pushover to Fragility) that is based on pushover analysis. This new approach is further compared and contrasted against traditional nonlinear dynamic analysis approaches like Incremental Dynamic Analysis and Multiple Stripe Analysis. The sensitivity of the resulting fragility curves is studied against multiple parameters including uncertainties in ground motion, the type of analysis method used and the choice of curve fitting technique. All these factors influence the fragility curve behavior and this study assesses the impact of changing these parameters.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference47 articles.
1. AISC 341 (2016). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. Chicago, IL.
2. Azarbakht, A., & Dolsek, M. (2011). Progressive incremental dynamic analysis for first-mode dominated structures. Journal of Structural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000282
3. Baker, J. W., & Cornell, C. A. (2006). Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35(9), 1077–1095.
4. Baker, J. W. (2011). Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground motion selection. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(3), 322–331.
5. Baker, J. W. (2013). Trade-offs in ground motion selection techniques for collapse assessment of structures. In: Proceedings Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vienna, Austria.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献