Empirical Investigation of Ranking vs Best–Worst Scaling Generated Preferences for Attributes of Quality of Life: One and the Same or Differentiable?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Empirical Investigation of Ranking vs Best–Worst Scaling Generated Preferences for Attributes of Quality of Life: One and the Same or Differentiable?

Published:2020-01-13 Issue:3 Volume:13 Page:307-315
ISSN:1178-1653
Container-title:The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Patient

Author:

Ratcliffe Julie^ORCID,Kaambwa Billingsley,Hutchinson Claire,Lancsar Emily

Funder

Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40271-019-00406-6.pdf

Reference34 articles.

1. Soekhai V, de Bekker-Grob E, Ellis A, Vass C. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: past, present and future. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019;37(2):201–26.

2. Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon J, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.

3. Whitty J, Lancsar E, Rixon K, Golenko X, Ratcliffe J. A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting. Patient. 2014;7(4):365–86.

4. Gu Y, Lancsar E, Ghijben P, Butler J, Donaldson C. Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: a systematic review of what counts and to what extent. Soc Sci Med. 2015;146:41–52.

5. Fryback D, Dasbach E, Klein R, et al. The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: initial catalog of health state quality factors. Med Decis Making. 1993;13(2):89–102.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Exploring Best–Worst Scaling for Communication Sciences and Disorders;Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups;2021-02-23