Funder
Innovation and Value Initiative
EveryLife Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference88 articles.
1. Mühlbacher AC, Nübling M. Analysis of physicians’ perspectives versus patients’ preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myeloma. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12:193–203.
2. Mavris M, Furia Helms A, Bere N. Engaging patients in medicines regulation: a tale of two agencies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:885–6.
3. Smith H, Horobin A, Fackrell K, Colley V, Thacker B, Hall DA. Defining and evaluating novel procedures for involving patients in core outcome set research: creating a meaningful long list of candidate outcome domains. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4:1–12.
4. Fagotto E, Burgués VA, Fung A. A Taxonomy to Engage Patients: Objectives, Design, and Patient Activation. NEJM Catalyst. Massachusetts Medical Society; 2019;5. https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/CAT.19.0626.
5. Vaughn Y, Richmond A, Simpson C, Israel T, Boone L. Comparing methods to make research more patient-centered. 2017. https://doi.org/10.25302/12.2019.ME.130603342. Accessed 5 Apr 2021.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献