Author:
Hodis Flaviu A.,Hodis Georgeta M.
Abstract
AbstractResearch findings indicate that two types of goals, which focus on the lowest (highest) levels of achievement possible in a learning setting, are strong predictors of how well students attain in school. Unfortunately, little is known about how these two goals, termed minimal boundary goals (MBG) and maximal levels of aspiration (MLA) relate to psychological constructs that are theorized to be antecedents of goals. To fill this knowledge gap, this research collected data from 463 secondary-school students and tested a model linking these goals to achievement motives and theory of intelligence. Results revealed that not believing that intelligence is fixed and devoting effort to studying was associated with a strong endorsement of MLA. At the same time, making low/no efforts to study, being afraid of failure, and believing that intelligence is fixed were strong predictors of MBG. These findings advance current knowledge and have important implications for teaching and learning.
Funder
Victoria University of Wellington
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference89 articles.
1. Adams, J., Priest, R. F., & Prince, H. T. (1985). Achievement motive: Analyzing the validity of the WOFO. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1985.tb00886.x
2. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–277). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Van Nostrand.
4. Atkinson, J. W. (1966). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. In J. W. Atkinson & N. T. Feather (Eds.), A theory of achievement motivation (pp. 11–31). Wiley.
5. Bates, T. C., Enkhbat, T., Gray, E., Lee, J., & Zakharin, M. (2023). How to get things done: Tight linkage of conscientiousness with twelve mechanisms of Goal Setting Theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 214, 112331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112331