Abstract
AbstractThe present study aims to deepen our understanding of the relationship between metacognitive awareness and approaches to learning in a multidisciplinary context of higher education using a person-oriented approach. The participants in the present study were 462 third year students of humanities, social sciences and theology. The students filled in a HowULearn questionnaire which included 18 items related to metacognitive awareness and 12 to approaches to learning. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to explore the factor structure of the instruments. The data were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation, K-means cluster analysis and One-way ANOVA. The results showed that two dimensions of metacognitive awareness, namely knowledge about cognition and regulation of cognition, emerged from the data. Knowledge about cognition was evaluated higher than regulation of cognition. The results showed that both dimensions of metacognitive awareness were statistically significantly related to a deep approach to learning and organized studying and negatively to an unreflective approach. Furthermore, three learning profiles were identified and they differed in both of these dimensions of metacognitive awareness. More precisely, students representing organized students applying a deep approach had higher scores on knowledge about cognition as well as on regulation of cognition compared with the students representing unorganized studentsapplying a deep approach or those with a dissonant profile. In addition, students representing the dissonant profile had statistically significantly lower scores on knowledge about cognition than those students representing unorganized students applying a deep approach. The present study implies that students with different study profiles need different types of support for the metacognitive awareness of their own learning processes.
Funder
University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference79 articles.
1. Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 205–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9406-6
2. Asikainen, H., Salmela-Aro, K., Parpala, A., & Katajavuori, N. (2020). Learning profiles and their relation to study-related burnout and academic achievement among university students. Learning and Individual Differences, 78, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101781
3. Backhaus, K., & Liff, J. P. (2007). Cognitive styles and approaches to studying in management education. Journal of Management Education, 31(4), 445–466
4. Beccaria, L., Kek, M., Huijser, H., Rose, J., & Kimmins, L. (2014). The interrelationships between student approaches to learning and group work. Nurse Education Today, 34(7), 1094–1103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.02.006
5. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献