On the probability of observing Borda’s paradox-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

On the probability of observing Borda’s paradox

Published:2009-07-31 Issue:1 Volume:35 Page:1-23
ISSN:0176-1714
Container-title:Social Choice and Welfare
language:en
Short-container-title:Soc Choice Welf

Author:

Gehrlein William V.,Lepelley Dominique

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00355-009-0415-3.pdf

Reference25 articles.

1. Arrow KJ (1963) Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven

2. Bezembinder T (1996) The plurality majority converse under single peakedness. Soc Choice Welf 13: 365–380. doi: 10.1007/BF00179239

3. Black D (1958) The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

4. Colman AM, Poutney I (1978) Borda’s voting paradox: theoretical likelihood and electoral occurrences. Behav Sci 23: 15–20. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830230103

5. de Borda J (1784) A paper on elections by ballot. In: Sommerlad F, McLean I (1989, eds) The political theory of Condorcet. University of Oxford working paper, Oxford, pp 122–129

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Computations of volumes in five candidates elections;Scientific Reports;2023-08-15

2. IAC Probability Calculations in Voting Theory: Progress Report;Studies in Choice and Welfare;2020-12-19

3. On Some k-scoring Rules for Committee Elections: Agreement and Condorcet Principle;Revue d'économie politique;2020-11-12

4. Extensions of the Simpson voting rule to the committee selection setting;Public Choice;2019-07-27

5. Condorcet efficiency of the preference approval voting and the probability of selecting the Condorcet loser;Theory and Decision;2019-07-04