The fundamental rights agency: Towards an active Fundamental Rights policy of the Union

Author:

De Schutter Olivier,Van Goethem Valérie

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations

Reference46 articles.

1. The expression “Human Rights Agency” instead of “Fundamental Rights Agency” has also been used. The European Council has referred twice to the “Human Rights Agency”, once in conclusions from the Brussels European Council of 13 December 2003, and in the Hague Programme on the strengthening of Freedom, Security and Justice in the Union annexed to the conclusions of the European Council of 4–5 November 2004.

2. COM(2004) 693 final; A proposal for the establishment of amonitoring centre for human rights within the European Union, which could serve to improve the coordination of the fundamental rights policies pursued by the Member States, had already been made earlier, in particular, in a report prepared for the Comité des Sages responsible for draftingLeading by Example: A Human Rights Agenda for the European Union for the Year 2000: see P. Alston and J.H.H. Weiler, “An ‘Ever Closer Union’ in Need of a Human Rights Policy: The European Union and Human Rights”, in P. Alston, with M. Bustelo and J. Heenan (eds.), The European Union and Human Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 3.

3. All the contributions to this consultation are available on the following website: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/consulting_public/fundamental_rights_agency/news_contribution_fund_right_agency_en.htm Most of the contributions addressed the issues of the independency of the future Agency, its geographical scope, the quality of its expertise, its role under Article 7 EU and its complementarity with the already existing monitoring mechanisms in these fields, in particular with the Council of Europe and with the national human rights institutions. In additiona, acting upon the request of the European Commission, the European Policy Evaluation Consortium (EPEC) prepared two reports analysing the various responses to the public consultation and presenting the results of the discussions that took place during the public hearing: EPEC,Preparatory Study for Impact Assessment and Ex-Ante Evaluation of Fundamental Rights Agency Analysis of Responses to Public Consultation, 19 J anuary 2005 and EPEC,Preparatory Study for Impact Assessment and Ex-ante Evaluation of Fundamental Rights Agency -Public Hearing Report, February 2005. These reports are available on the following websites: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/consulting_public/ fundamental_rights_agency/analysis_written_contributions_en.pdf; http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/consulting_public/fundamental_rights_agency/report_public_hearing_en.pdf.

4. Proposal for a Council Regulation establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights and Proposal for a Council Decision empo wering the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights to pursue its activities in areas referred to in Title VI of the Treaty on European Union (COM(2005) 280 final of 30.6.2005).

5. SEC (2005) 849 of 30.6.2005, atp. 8.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3