Abstract
AbstractThere is a gap between the theoretical assumptions of wellbeing and its associated empirical constructs. Three measurement models (a correlated factors model, a second-order two-factor model, and a bifactor model) were analysed using a large sample of English adolescents (n = 37, 630) to test whether the theoretical separation between hedonic and eudemonic wellbeing is empirically supported, and whether there is the possibility of essential unidimensionality. Evidence of a general factor of wellbeing was found in the bifactor model, challenging the de-facto distinction often made between hedonic and eudemonic wellbeing.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference86 articles.
1. Alexandrova, A., & Haybron, D. M. (2016). Is construct validation valid? Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 1098–1109. https://doi.org/10.1086/687941
2. #BeeWell Research Team (2021). #BeeWell Survey. https://gmbeewell.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/BeeWell-Questionnaires-Booklet.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2024.
3. #BeeWell Research Team. (2022). Inequalities in Young People’s Wellbeing. https://gmbeewell.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/BeeWell-Inequalities-Evidence-Briefing.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2024.
4. Black, L., Panayiotou, M., & Humphrey, N. (2019). The dimensionality and latent structure of mental health difficulties and wellbeing in early adolescence. PLoS ONE, 14(2), e0213018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213018
5. Black, L., Humphrey, N., Panayiotou, M., & Marquez, J. (2022). Mental health and wellbeing measures for mean comparison and screening in adolescents: An assessment of unidimensionality and sex and age measurement invariance [Pre-print]. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/beu8s