Author:
González Mikel,Rodríguez Adrián,Pereira Octavio,de Lacalle Luis Norberto López
Abstract
AbstractNowadays, the combination of additive manufacturing technologies, together with the use of materials such as Inconel 718, opens new opportunities in the manufacture of aeronautical turbines. However, parts obtained directly through additive manufacturing are far from being considered suitable in their initial state, as they exhibit a poor surface finish that compromises their mechanical characteristics. Common among the defects found in such components are ridges stemming from thermal deformations during the powder fusion process. Therefore, abrasive brushing emerges as the prevalent method to rectify these surface imperfections. However, conventional roughness indicators prove insufficient in accurately characterizing such local defects during surface analysis. Consequently, this study investigates surface conditions of Inconel 718 parts produced through additive manufacturing, particularly focusing on defects caused by peak alignments along the powder fusion direction. Thus, a series of frontal brushing operations were conducted under varying conditions, with the aim of increasing the feed rate to address these defects. Subsequently, the effectiveness of the brushing process was assessed through the calculation of peak areas. The analysis of this indicator revealed that the maximum feed rate enabling complete removal of the peak marks was 500 mm/min.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Eusko Jaurlaritza
Universidad del País Vasco
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Zhu J, Zhou H, Wang C et al (2021) A review of topology optimization for additive manufacturing: status and challenges. Chin J Aeronaut 34:91–110
2. Alkhatib SE, Xu S, Lu G et al (2024) Rate-dependent behaviour of additively manufactured topology optimised lattice structures. Thin-Walled Struct 198:111710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2024.111710
3. Liu J, Huang J, Zheng Y et al (2023) Challenges in topology optimization for hybrid additive–subtractive manufacturing: a review. Comput Aided Des 161:103531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2023.103531
4. Chowdhury S, Yadaiah N, Prakash C et al (2022) Laser powder bed fusion: a state-of-the-art review of the technology, materials, properties & defects, and numerical modelling. J Market Res 20:2109–2172
5. Seltzman AH, Wukitch SJ (2021) Resolution and geometric limitations in laser powder bed fusion additively manufactured GRCop-84 structures for a lower hybrid current drive launcher. Fusion Eng Des 173:112847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112847
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献