Abstract
AbstractIn an individualized shee metal assembly line, form and dimensional variation of the in-going parts and different disturbances from the assembly process result in the final geometrical deviations. Securing the final geometrical requirements in the sheet metal assemblies is of importance for achieving aesthetic and functional quality. Spot welding sequence is one of the influential contributors to the final geometrical deviation. Evaluating spot welding sequences to retrieve lower geometrical deviations is computationally expensive. In a geometry assurance digital twin, where assembly parameters are set to reach an optimal geometrical outcome, a limited time is available for performing this computation. Building a surrogate model based on the physical experiment data for each assembly is time-consuming. Performing heuristic search algorithms, together with the FEM simulation, requires extensive evaluations times. In this paper, a neural network approach is introduced for building surrogate models of the individual assemblies. The surrogate model builds the relationship between the spot welding sequence and geometrical deviation. The approach results in a drastic reduction in evaluation time, up to 90%, compared to the genetic algorithm, while reaching a geometrical deviation with marginal error from the global optimum after welding in a sequence.
Funder
The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Software,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference28 articles.
1. Wärmefjord K, Söderberg R, Ericsson M, Appelgren A, Lundbäck A, Lööf J, Lindkvist L, Svensson HO (2016) Welding of non-nominal geometries – physical tests. Procedia CIRP 43:136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.046, 14th CIRP CAT 2016 - CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing
2. Söderberg R, Lindkvist L, Wärmefjord K, Carlson JS (2016) Virtual geometry assurance process and toolbox. Procedia CIRP 43:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.043, 14th CIRP CAT 2016 - CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing
3. Moos S, Vezzetti E (2012) Compliant assembly tolerance analysis: guidelines to formalize the resistance spot welding plasticity effects. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 61(5):503–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3729-0
4. Wärmefjord K, Söderberg R, Lindkvist L (2010) Variation simulation of spot welding sequence for sheet metal assemblies. In: Proceedings of NordDesign2010 international conference on methods and tools for product and production development, vol 2, pp 519–528
5. Tabar RS, Wärmefjord K, Söderberg R (2018) Evaluating evolutionary algorithms on spot welding sequence optimization with respect to geometrical variation. Procedia CIRP 75:421–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.061
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献