1. Gurevitch AC, Murr LE, Shih HK, Niou CS, Advani AH, Manuel D, Zernow L (1993) Characterization and comparison of microstructures in the shaped-charge regime: copper and tantalum. Mater Charact 30(3):201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/1044-5803(93)90022-N
2. Ho J, Lough CS, Mulligan P, Kinzel EC, Johnson CE (2018) Additive manufacturing of liners for shaped charges. In: Solid Freeform Fabrication 2018: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium – An Additive Manufacturing Conference. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX pp 479–487. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/geosci_geo_peteng_facwork/1437
3. Schwartz AJ, Baker EL (1999) Effect of interior surface finish on the break-up of copper shaped charge liners. In: Proceeding of the 18th International Ballistics Symposium. Lawrence Livermore National Lab., California, pp 1–10. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc619039/
4. Jing YD, Xue B, Tang C, Li P, Chang B, Liu FW, Jia M, Xia Q, Xiao Q, Chen Q, Shu DY (2018) Effect of fine grain size on the performance of shaped charge. In: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Defence Technology. KCMS, pp 254–256. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=IPFD&filename=ZGBB201810001062
5. Guo CA, Han JL, Cheng C, Zhao S, Cao F, Zhang J (2016) Manufacture of deep-cone shaped charge liner with changeable wall thickness in cold stamping based on CAE. Forging Stamping Technol 41(1):20–25. https://doi.org/10.13330/j.issn.1000-3940.2016.01.005. (in Chinese)