Author:
Strohschein Jan,Fischbach Andreas,Bunte Andreas,Faeskorn-Woyke Heide,Moriz Natalia,Bartz-Beielstein Thomas
Abstract
AbstractThis paper presents the cognitive module of the Cognitive Architecture for Artificial Intelligence (CAAI) in cyber-physical production systems (CPPS). The goal of this architecture is to reduce the implementation effort of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in CPPS. Declarative user goals and the provided algorithm-knowledge base allow the dynamic pipeline orchestration and configuration. A big data platform (BDP) instantiates the pipelines and monitors the CPPS performance for further evaluation through the cognitive module. Thus, the cognitive module is able to select feasible and robust configurations for process pipelines in varying use cases. Furthermore, it automatically adapts the models and algorithms based on model quality and resource consumption. The cognitive module also instantiates additional pipelines to evaluate algorithms from different classes on test functions. CAAI relies on well-defined interfaces to enable the integration of additional modules and reduce implementation effort. Finally, an implementation based on Docker, Kubernetes, and Kafka for the virtualization and orchestration of the individual modules and as messaging technology for module communication is used to evaluate a real-world use case.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Software,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference53 articles.
1. Altintas I, Marcus K, Nealey I, Sellars SL, Graham J, Mishin D, Polizzi J, Crawl D, Defanti T, Smarr L (2019) Workflow-driven distributed machine learning in CHASE-CI: A cognitive hardware and software ecosystem community infrastructure. In: Proceedings - 2019 IEEE 33rd international parallel and distributed processing symposium workshops (IPDPSW). https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW.2019.00142, vol 2019, pp 865–873
2. Atkinson AC, Fedorov VV, Herzberg AM, Zhang R (2014) Elemental information matrices and optimal experimental design for generalized regression models. J Stat Plan Inference 144:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2012.09.012, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378375812003060. International Conference on Design of Experiments
3. Bartz-Beielstein T, Doerr C, Bossek J, Chandrasekaran S, Eftimov T, Fischbach A, Kerschke P, Lopez-Ibanez M, Malan KM, Moore JH, Naujoks B, Orzechowski P, Volz V, Wagner M, Weise T (2020) Benchmarking in optimization: best practice and open issues. arXiv:2007.03488
4. Bartz-Beielstein T, Gentile L, Zaefferer M (2017) In a nutshell: sequential parameter optimization. arXiv:1712.04076
5. Bhatti MA (2000) Optimization problem formulation. Springer New York, New York, pp 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0501-2_1
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献