1. acatech. 2011. Akzeptanz von Technik und Infrastrukturen. Anmerkungen zu einem aktuellen Gesellschaftlichen Problem, Positionspapier. Hrsg. von acatech – Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften. https://www.acatech.de/publikation/akzeptanz-von-technik-und-infrastrukturen/.
2. Bartels, Larry M. 2010. Some Unfulfilled Promises of Quantitative Imperialism. In Rethinking Social Inquiry Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, Hrsg. von David Collier, und Henry E. Brady, 83–88. 2. Aufl. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
3. Basta, C., 2012. Risk and spatial planning. In Handbook of Risk Theory, Eds. Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., und Peterson, M. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 265–294.
4. Baumann, M., J.F. Peters, M. Weil, und A. Grunwald. 2017. CO2 Footprint and Life-Cycle Costs of Electrochemical Energy Storage for Stationary Grid Applications. Energy Technology 5(7):1071–1083.
5. Benoît, C., und B. Mazijn, Hrsg. 2009. Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Social and socio-economic LCA guidelines complementing environmental LCA and Life Cycle Costing, contributing to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/2009-%20GuidelinesforsLCA-EN.pdf.