Abstract
AbstractAt present, the European rule of law enforcement framework under Article 7 TEU (RLF) is vulnerable to unguaranteed, discretionary influences of the Member States. This vulnerability arises from its procedural format which requires high thresholds in decision-making with the effect that this procedure is prone to be terminated by the EU Member States likely to be scrutinized under it, if only they collude. Yet, the Framework may prove effective to correct serious breaches against human rights (in the context of ineffective rule of law standards). The European Commission is bound to pursue the RLF effectiveness for the sake of achieving relative uniformity of application of EU law (at large), and making the European Union a credible actor and co-creator of international legal order. The RLF is an important tool for the maintenance of relative stability of human rights and the rule of law in the EU despite natural divergence propensity resulting from the procedural autonomy of the EU Member States. By achieving this stability, the EU achieves significant political weight in international dialogue concerning human rights and the rule of law and preserves a high level of its global credibility in this context. Thus, RLF increases the EU’s effectiveness in promoting the European model of their identification and enforcement.
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Reference24 articles.
1. Andersen S (2012) Enforcement of European Union law: the role of the European Commission. Oxford University Press, Oxford
2. Arnull A (2006) The European Union and its Court of Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
3. Bagińska E, Majkowska-Szulc S (2018) Causation as a requirement for the Member State liability under Art. 7 TEU in conjunction with Art. 2 TEU. In: Hatje A, Tichý L (eds) Liability of Member States for the violation of the fundamental values of the EU. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 125–144
4. Bedner A (2010) An elementary approach to the rule of law. Hague J Rule Law 2(1):48–74
5. Bonelli M, Claes MN (2018) Judicial serendipity: how Portuguese judges came to rescue the Polish judiciary. Eur Const Law Rev 14(3):622–643
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献