1. Abrahamson, D., Nathan, M. J., Williams-Pierce, C., Walkington, C., Ottmar, E. R., Soto, H., & Alibali, M. W. (2020). The future of embodied design for mathematics teaching and learning. Frontiers in Education, 5(147). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00147.
2. Bakker, A., Cai, J., English, L., et al. (2019). Beyond small, medium, or large: Points of consideration when interpreting effect sizes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1–8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09908-4.
3. Böhm, J. (Ed.). (1992). Teaching mathematics with derive. Proceedings of the International School on the Didactics of Computer Algebra. Chartwell Bratt.
4. Buchberger, B. (1990). Should students learn integration rules? ACM Sigsam Bulletin, 24(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/382276.1095228.
5. Drijvers, P. (2018a). Empirical evidence for benefit? Reviewing quantitative research on the use of digital tools in mathematics education. In L. Ball, P. Drijvers, S. Ladel, H.-S. Siller, M. Tabach, & C. Vale (Eds.), Uses of technology in primary and secondary mathematics education; Tools, topics and trends (S. 161–178). Springer.