Estimation of uncertainty from duplicate measurements: new quantification procedure in the case of concentration-dependent precision

Author:

Synek Václav,Kříženecká Sylvie

Abstract

AbstractIn many analytical measurements, the analyte concentration in test samples can vary considerably. In such cases, the standard deviation (SD) quantifying measurement imprecision should be expressed as a function of the concentration, c: $${s}_{c}=\sqrt{{\mathrm{s}}_{0}^{2}+{ s}_{r}^{2}{c}^{2}}$$ s c = s 0 2 + s r 2 c 2 , where s0 represents a non-zero SD at zero concentration and sr represents a near-constant relative SD at very high concentrations. In the case of SD repeatability, these parameters can be estimated from the differences of duplicated results measured on routine test samples. Datasets with a high number of duplicate results can be obtained within internal quality control. Most procedures recommended for this estimation are based on statistically demanding weighted regression.This article proposes a statistically less demanding procedure. The s0 and sr parameters are estimated from selected subsets of absolute and relative differences of duplicates measured at low to medium concentrations and high to medium concentrations, respectively. The estimates are obtained by iterative calculations from the root mean square of the differences with a correction for the influence of the second parameter. This procedure was verified on Monte Carlo simulated datasets. The variability of the parameter estimates obtained by this proposed procedure may be similar or slightly worse than that of the estimates obtained by the best regression procedure, but better than the variability of the estimates obtained by other tested regression procedures. However, a selection of the duplicates from an inappropriate concentration range may cause a substantial increase in variability of the estimates obtained.

Funder

Smart City – Smart Region – Smart Community

Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Instrumentation,General Chemical Engineering,General Chemistry

Reference27 articles.

1. Casella G, Berger RL (2002) Statistical inference, 2nd edn. Thompson Learning Academic Resource Center, DUXBURY

2. Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London

3. Eckschlager K (1969) Errors, measurement and results in chemical analysis, 1st, English. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., London

4. Ellison SLR, Barwick VJ, Duguid Farrant TJ (2009) Practical statistics for the analytical scientist. A bench guide, 2nd edn. RSC Publishing, Cambridge

5. Ellison SLR, Williams A (Eds) (2012) Eurachem/CITAC guide CG 4: Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, 3rd edn. (ISBN 978–0–948926–30–3) www.eurachem.org.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3