Do we need to rethink collaborative trials?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Do we need to rethink collaborative trials?

Published:2008-06-06 Issue:8 Volume:13 Page:479-482
ISSN:0949-1775
Container-title:Accreditation and Quality Assurance
language:en
Short-container-title:Accred Qual Assur

Author:

Thompson Michael

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Instrumentation,General Chemical Engineering,General Chemistry

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-008-0417-3.pdf

Reference9 articles.

1. Horwitz W (1995) Pure Appl Chem 67:331–343. doi: 10.1351/pac199567020331

2. ISO 5725-2:1994 Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurements and results—Part 2. Basic methods for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method. International Standards Organisation, Geneva

3. Thompson M, Lowthian PJ (1997) J AOAC Int 80:676–679

4. Ellison SLR, Mathieson K (2008) Accredit Qual Assur 13:321–238

5. Boyer KW, Horwitz W, Albert R (1985) Anal Chem 57:454–459. doi: 10.1021/ac50001a031

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. On the validation by inter-laboratory study of ‘procedures’ in chemical measurement;Analytical Methods;2016

2. The comparison between reproducibility standard deviations from collaborative trials and proficiency tests: a preliminary study from food analysis;Analytical Methods;2016

3. The Characteristic Function, a Method-Specific Alternative to the Horwitz Function;Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL;2012-11-01

4. Precision in chemical analysis: a critical survey of uses and abuses;Analytical Methods;2012

5. ISO 5725 and GUM: comparison and comments;Accreditation and Quality Assurance;2008-12-13